Stockbroking | Wealth Management | Corporate Advice

x

Resizing text on the web

To increase or decrease the magnification of a web page, press Ctrl and '+' (plus) to zoom in or Ctrl and '-' (minus) to zoom out. To return the page to its original size, press Ctrl + 0.

You can also scroll the mouse wheel up and down while holding Ctrl to increase/decrease zoom level.

Trump gambles with more economic stimulus

US president Donald Trump with his budget proposal raises his bet that he will boost the economy before high inflation and interest rates get in the way.

Congress has already given him tax cuts and increased deficit spending that is expected to stimulate the economy.

But here's the risk: Trump's stimulus could boost hiring without triggering the kinds of company investments that make workers more productive.

With workers in short supply in many industries, the wages that are now increasing could get eaten away by higher inflation.

Trump's $US4.4 trillion budget proposal suggests Congress could cut the federal budget deficit by $US3 trillion over 10 years. That's unlikely.

The budget proposal follows business and household tax cuts enacted in January and a federal funding law that could push budget deficits to around $US1 trillion a year.

The 2019 fiscal budget that Trump just submitted asks for $US200 billion for infrastructure spending over 10 years, $US18 billion over two years for his wall along the Mexican border and $US13 billion to deal with the opioid crisis.

It also provides for $US716 billion for military programs and for maintaining the US nuclear arsenal.

"If it doesn't work, we get a larger hole in the long-term budget and no productivity growth," said Douglas Holtz-Eakin, a former White House chief economist under Republican President George W. Bush.

"That would be a bad outcome."

He said this was a necessary gamble. Yes, the additional stimulus might push inflation too high, which would trigger aggressive rate hikes by the independent Federal Reserve.

But price gains might also remain modest, Holtz-Eakin said.

Holtz-Eakin and other conservative economists view cutting taxes for businesses as America's best chance for long-term growth.

With higher economic growth, Washington might be able to tame budget deficits and avoid an eventual crisis over its $US20.5 trillion debt. He says the tax cuts for households were economically unnecessary given current strength in the labour market.

Implicit in Trump's new proposal is a very optimistic economic growth projection of 3 per cent a year over the next 10 years. That is well above the roughly 2 per cent congressional and private analysts have been predicting.

The Fed is watching Trump's stimulative gamble closely. Policymakers say the Fed could accelerate its pace of interest rate hikes if inflation shows signs of taking off.

In the short term, surging deficits raise inflation risks with the jobless rate near a 17-year low. One way to draw workers to a job or retain them is to raise pay.

"Because of that, it is important that the (Fed) continues" raising rates, Kansas City Fed President Esther George has said.

Fed policymakers track corporate investments because spending on machinery, R&D and other boosters that make workers more productive can help companies contain costs and reduce inflation pressures.

A Chicago Federal Reserve Bank survey last month found companies expect to spend only a quarter of tax savings on capital investments.

About 60 per cent would be used to pay down debt, fund mergers and return money to shareholders. The remaining 15 per cent would be spent hiring workers or raising wages.

Fed policymakers also worry that unchecked deficits could lead investors to bid up interest rates, making it harder for the government to pay its debts.

"That could make the Federal Reserve's job more difficult," New York Fed President William Dudley told Bloomberg in an interview, citing projections by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office for federal debt servicing costs to double over the next 10 years.

Over the long run, higher interest rates could counter all of Trump's fiscal stimulus, said Jason Furman, a White House chief economist under former Democratic President Barack Obama.

Inflation rates and unemployment rates would be at similar levels, but higher interest rates would crimp future investments.

"The short run might be okay. But it chips away at our wealth in the long run," Furman said.

Austrlaian Associated PressBack to Breaking News

Market Indices